Lump sum contract - pros and cons
A lump sum contract is the traditional means of procuring construction, and involves a single ‘lump sum’ price for all the works being agreed before the works begin.
It is generally considered a beneficial contract agreement if the work is well defined when tenders are sought and significant changes to requirements are unlikely. This means that the contractor is able to accurately price the works they are being asked to carry out.
The advantages of a lump sum contract include:
- Lump sum contracts can be seen to reduce client risk as the price is fixed (although in reality it is still likely to vary, but not by as much as some other forms of contracting).
- It is widely accepted and understood as a method of contracting.
- The bidding analysis and selection process is relatively straight-forward.
- The greater degree of certainty on the part of the client can make it simpler and easier to secure a construction loan.
- Change orders are minimised.
- The management required by the client is reduced.
- There can under certain circumstances be a greater margin for profit for the contractor.
- Lump sum payments are made in regular, predictable instalments, providing the contractor with a reliable and stable cash flow and making financing simpler for the client.
Disadvantages include:
- It can give greater risk to the contractor than some other contract forms, as there are fewer mechanisms available for them to vary their price.
- As a result of the additional risks faced by the contractor, they may increase their tender price.
- Careful documentation and record keeping of change orders is required, which can be time-intensive.
- Preparing the tender may be more expensive for the contractor.
- As a result, there may be a slower tender process than for other contract forms.
- Progress may be slower as the design will generally need to be completed before the works begin.
- The employer may have to pay a higher price for any alteration or additions that are required that are beyond the scope of the contract.
- It can be seen as a more adversarial form of contracting than some more collaborative forms.
- Disputes can arise relating to change orders, scope and design changes, and so on.
[edit] Find out more
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles
Check out some of the best features and news from Designing Buildings as well as key stories from around the web.
The Building Safety Regulator announces a call for evidence.
Government approach could undermine delivery and regeneration.
World's first mass timber data centre.
The overlooked environmental aspect of data centre development.
Introduction to radon awareness
New technical information sheet published by CIOB.
Updated supplier guide can help electrical contractors engage with NHP.
CIAT confirm the winners of the 2026 architectural technology awards.
Government launches a one stop shop for flood preparedness.
Sir Edwin Lutyens: Britain's greatest architect? Book review.
CIOB publishes free template to help assess and manage risks.
ECA's reflections on Party Conference season
Burnham wants to be confident of winning before asking for a fresh mandate.
New Chief Construction and Scientific Adviser
Sergio Cavalaro, Professor of Infrastructure Systems at Loughborough University.
Building safety levy for England
CIAT publish estimator tool for members.
















